Annotating Vision-Language Data

Data annotation for visual language models is a key step in building high-quality multimodal systems. It includes image caption generation, visual question-answer (VQA) markup, and accurate grounding of text elements in visual context. Correct and consistent annotation allows the model to recognize objects, understand their relationships, and generate relevant text descriptions,  which is crucial for effective scene understanding in multimodal AI systems. High-quality VLM training data is therefore essential to teach models these associations effectively.

Key Findings

  • Multimodal AI systems process visual and textual information simultaneously.
  • Three main tasks include answering questions about images, creating captions, and associating text with image regions.
  • Carefully annotated training data is the basis for training these systems.
  • The technology is used in healthcare, robotics, and media.
  • Training involves making associations between visual features and embedded text.

Understanding the linguistic data of vision and its meaning

Combining graphical content and written descriptions creates systems that understand context in ways that are not possible with other approaches. Human perception combines multiple senses. Machines are now replicating this through multimodal processing.

The role of images and text in AI

Visual and textual information work together. When an AI sees an image and reads the associated text, it makes connections between the two. This approach teaches the system to associate objects with words. For example, recognizing a bird in an image and associating it with the word "bird" in the description.

The technology maps visual features to linguistic concepts. Colors, shapes, and spatial locations are associated with semantic meanings.

Real-world impact and applications

Approach

Data Types

Understanding Level

Real-World Use Cases

Single-Modal

Only images or only text

Basic recognition

Simple image classification

Multimodal

Images + text together

Contextual understanding

Medical diagnosis, autonomous vehicles

Human-Like

Multiple sensory inputs

Complex reasoning

Natural conversation about visual scenes

Fundamentals of Visual Language Data Annotation

To create datasets that train computers to understand images along with text, different annotation approaches are needed. These methods form the basis of multimodal artificial intelligence systems that process visual and textual information together.

A Review of Virtual Quality Assurance (VQA), Image Captions, and Grounding

Virtual quality assurance in visual language data annotation aims to verify the correspondence between an image and its textual annotations. In contrast to classical manual review, VQA uses automated or semi-automated approaches, including VLM models, to detect:

  • hallucinations in text descriptions;
  • missed visual elements;
  • logical and spatial inconsistencies;
  • ambiguous or overly general formulations.

Image captioning is a basic form of visual-linguistic annotation that transforms visual information into a structured natural language description. To train modern VLMs, it is important that captions accurately represent visible objects, actions, and attributes, a process sometimes referred to as attribute annotation, ensuring that models capture fine-grained details of the scene.

Visual grounding establishes a connection between linguistic elements and specific regions of the image. In annotation, this process, often referred to as visual grounding, can involve linking words or phrases to bounding boxes, masks, or key points.

Computer vision | Keylabs

Key issues in multimodal annotation

Problem

Short Description

Text–image mismatch

Text annotations do not always reflect actual objects or actions in the image.

Model hallucinations

Automatically generated captions may invent objects or details not present in the image.

Missing objects

Important scene elements are not mentioned in captions or labeled in the image.

Grounding difficulties

Challenges in accurately linking words or phrases to specific regions of the image.

Ambiguous descriptions

Text contains general or multi-meaning formulations, complicating model training.

Linguistic variability

Variations in style, grammar, and terminology make annotation standardization difficult.

Annotation scalability

Manual annotation is time- and resource-consuming; automation is often less accurate.

Contextual inconsistencies

Scene descriptions may ignore object relationships or spatial logic.

Image quality issues

Low resolution, noise, or darkness affect annotation accuracy.

Annotation subjectivity

Different people may describe the same scene differently, creating inconsistencies.

Research on VLM architectures and contrastive learning

Current models are based on various architectural approaches that allow the integration of information from both modalities. The main architectures include dual-modal transformers with separate encoders, where one encoder processes images, and the other processes text data, and their representations are then combined to perform multimodal integration tasks.

An alternative approach is to use a single transformer with a combined input that receives a sequence of image and text tokens, learning a joint representation without separating the streams. Such architectures allow the model to capture complex relationships between visual and verbal information, which is important for tasks such as image caption generation, visual question-and-answer, and content search.

Contrastive learning is widely used to train VLMs, enabling the model to build a shared representation space for images and text. The model is trained to maximize the similarity of positive pairs and minimize the similarity of negative pairs. This allows for a clear distinction between the semantic content of different inputs. Contrastive learning enables the model to generalize even when new images or descriptions are not presented during training, and also significantly improves the quality of annotations.

PrefixLM methods and their applications

PrefixLM (Prefix Language Model) is an approach to training language models that combines the principles of autogenerative text modeling with the possibility of a controlled or conditional generative process. The idea is to use a "prefix" of a fixed or dynamically specified sequence of tokens, which serves as a context for further text generation. Unlike standard autogenerative models, PrefixLM enables you to clearly define the initial context, or "instruction," that sets the style, topic, or task of generation.

PrefixLM methodology:

  1. Prefix context. A part of the text that is fed as input and does not change during generation (question, instruction, task description).
  2. Generative block. An autogenerative language model that continues the prefix and creates the corresponding text.
  3. Learning on conditional data. The model is trained on "prefix-result" pairs, which enables it to generate text consistently based on a specific context.

SimVLM and VirTex approaches

Approach

Architectural Style

Visual Processing

Text Generation

Key Strength

SimVLM

Unified Transformer

Vision Transformer patches

Encoder-decoder sequence

Simplified training process

VirTex

Hybrid CNN-Transformer

Convolutional feature extraction

Transformer-based head

Strong feature recognition

Using No-Training Approaches in Visual Language Models

In modern visual language models, attention is given to approaches that enable the model to be used without requiring special training on a specific dataset. Such methods are usually referred to as zero-shot or few-shot approaches, as well as prompt-based use of models.

Zero-shot approaches enable the model to perform tasks it did not encounter during training, thanks to universal representations of text and images in a common multimodal space.

Few-shot methods incorporate additional examples that enable the model to understand the task's specifics better and enhance the accuracy of generation or classification.

Prompt-based use of models is effective in tasks such as signature generation, visual question-answering, content search, or interactive multimodal agents.

Such approaches reduce the need for large labeled datasets, allow systems to be quickly scaled to new domains, and provide flexibility in application, even in cases where specific data for training is insufficient.

Evaluating Visual Language Models

Evaluating the quality of visual language models (VLMs) requires specialized metrics that enable the comparison of generated image captions with human reference descriptions.

Metric

What it measures

Main idea

BLEU

N-gram precision

Compares the overlap of N-grams between generated and reference text

ROUGE

Coverage and recall

Evaluates how well the generated text covers reference fragments (e.g., ROUGE-L — longest common subsequence)

METEOR

Lexical and semantic similarity

Based on word alignments, considers synonyms, word order, and morphology

CIDEr

Semantic relevance in VLM

Uses TF-IDF weighting of N-grams and matches them against multiple reference captions, emphasizing unique and informative elements

FAQ

What is the primary goal of visual search for answers to questions?

The primary objective is to deliver precise and semantically coherent responses to natural language questions, informed by the analysis of visual content.

What are the typical applications of these technologies?

Typical applications of these technologies include image caption generation, visual question answering, multimodal search, and interactive agent systems.

What makes data annotation difficult for these systems?

Data annotation is complicated by the need for precise consistency between visual objects and text descriptions, taking into account the scene context and the semantic diversity of the captions.

Are these models capable of understanding images without specialized training?

Modern large visual language models are capable of understanding and interpreting images without specialized training by relying on zero-shot or prompt-based approaches.